To make Venus into an ideal habitat for humans, I think one step that will need to be done in order to transform Venus is to speed up that planet's rotation.
Earth rotates on its axis once every 24 hours. It takes Venus over 100 Earth days to rotate once on its (Venus's) axis.
One of the changes that I think would be ideal would be for Venus to have a day that was similar in length to Earth's. To do that, we would have to speed up the rotation of the planet.
One of the quintrillion (a quintillion times a trillion; I just made that up; you're welcome) and seven things that I don't know is what factor the orbital speed and mass of the moon have on the Earth's rotational speed. If two objects in an orbital relationship with each other orbit around a common center of gravity (their barycenter), and if the barycenter of Earth and the Moon is located 25% of the distance between the Earth's surface and Earth's core, could the Moon's momentum and gravitational pull contribute to the rotational speed of Earth?
If so, what if over a period of centuries enough asteroids were brought from the asteroid belt to construct a Moon-sized satellite for Venus? Would the combination of the mass and the orbital momentum of that man-made satellite cause Venus to orbit faster about its axis, and shorten the Venusian day?
Dr. Drew interviewed Scott Adams recently, and Scott Adams mentioned the absurdity that Republicans went to overthrow the government on Jan 6, but they neglected to bring their guns. On the first or second anniversary of the event, that alleged oversight made the narrative appear absurd to me, so I made a "video" that was supposed to be audio from January 6, captured on a video camera from which the lens cap had not been removed. I'm posting it again just because.
While I was waiting on hold to talk with a human at the IRS, I decided to put some food out for the dogs. I set the full bag of dog food on a chair, and walked away to get the bowls. When I turned around I saw the bag slowly tipping over, spilling much of its contents onto the floor. Fortunately I had help cleaning it up.
You can download a copy for personal use from https://github.com/MarkJamesWooding/WavePhysics/blob/main/WavePhysics_v2.0.pdf .
If the main points of this theory are correct, it will be the largest paradigm shift in physics in several centuries. If history is any guide, I'm not likely to live long enough to see it become adopted, but participating with several AI in bringing the theory this far has been a great privilege.
The theory of Wave Physics is finally out. It is the product of collaboration between a human and multiple AI. It is a polite declaration of war on the Standard Model of particle physics.
It is available in ebook, paperback and hardcover at Amazon.com. https://www.amazon.com/Wave-Physics-Replacement-Standard-Particle/dp/B0GRF15991/
I have attached a pdf sample that includes the beginning of the book through chapter 4, which includes our conclusions on the nature of time and relativity.
But this book makes many more claims:
The underlying structure of the universe is a two-dimensional membrane.
Energetic activity causes it to extend into the third dimension, sometimes transiently, sometimes in stable extrusions that can potentially last as long as the universe.
We completely re-envision the composition of atoms.
Protons, neutrons and the helium-1 atom (protium) are the same structure under different conditions.
There are no subatomic particles. The helium-1 atom without an electron is the smallest ...
This version of the detailed technical paper does not yet have sources listed, and still needs some polishing, but I want to put it out there because you never know what could happen. Whatever does happen, I'll have the satisfaction of knowing that at least its out there.
I guided 3 AI in writing this paper: Lumo, Gemini, and Grok. The Wave Physics framework solves discrepancies between quantum physics and relativity, explains dark matter and dark energy, and more.
