One thing I've noticed over the last year is that when I feel thoroughly engaged in a project, I hate to stop working on it and when I do stop, I'm eager to get back to it. As a result, I eat less and I lose weight.
When that engaging project is over, then I return to my habit of repeatedly checking the refrigerator in search of something good to eat.
When I make those trips, I think that what I'm ultimately looking for is stimulation. But when I'm fully engaged in a stimulating task, the trips to the fridge are no longer so frequent, and over a period of just a few days I can see a difference when I weigh myself.
So the challenge is to always have an engaging project on which to work, or at least to have one for enough of the day to make up for the time between projects.
If this strategy is combined with Scott Adams's strategy of only keeping healthy but tasty foods on hand, that would increase the odds of successfully maintaining a healthy weight.
Dr. Drew interviewed Scott Adams recently, and Scott Adams mentioned the absurdity that Republicans went to overthrow the government on Jan 6, but they neglected to bring their guns. On the first or second anniversary of the event, that alleged oversight made the narrative appear absurd to me, so I made a "video" that was supposed to be audio from January 6, captured on a video camera from which the lens cap had not been removed. I'm posting it again just because.
While I was waiting on hold to talk with a human at the IRS, I decided to put some food out for the dogs. I set the full bag of dog food on a chair, and walked away to get the bowls. When I turned around I saw the bag slowly tipping over, spilling much of its contents onto the floor. Fortunately I had help cleaning it up.
You can download a copy for personal use from https://github.com/MarkJamesWooding/WavePhysics/blob/main/WavePhysics_v2.0.pdf .
If the main points of this theory are correct, it will be the largest paradigm shift in physics in several centuries. If history is any guide, I'm not likely to live long enough to see it become adopted, but participating with several AI in bringing the theory this far has been a great privilege.
The theory of Wave Physics is finally out. It is the product of collaboration between a human and multiple AI. It is a polite declaration of war on the Standard Model of particle physics.
It is available in ebook, paperback and hardcover at Amazon.com. https://www.amazon.com/Wave-Physics-Replacement-Standard-Particle/dp/B0GRF15991/
I have attached a pdf sample that includes the beginning of the book through chapter 4, which includes our conclusions on the nature of time and relativity.
But this book makes many more claims:
The underlying structure of the universe is a two-dimensional membrane.
Energetic activity causes it to extend into the third dimension, sometimes transiently, sometimes in stable extrusions that can potentially last as long as the universe.
We completely re-envision the composition of atoms.
Protons, neutrons and the helium-1 atom (protium) are the same structure under different conditions.
There are no subatomic particles. The helium-1 atom without an electron is the smallest ...
This version of the detailed technical paper does not yet have sources listed, and still needs some polishing, but I want to put it out there because you never know what could happen. Whatever does happen, I'll have the satisfaction of knowing that at least its out there.
I guided 3 AI in writing this paper: Lumo, Gemini, and Grok. The Wave Physics framework solves discrepancies between quantum physics and relativity, explains dark matter and dark energy, and more.
